Legal Opinion

Middleton v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 29, 2002No. A01A2219PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

Glen Middleton appeals his conviction for burglary. He contends the trial court erred by allowing him to proceed to trial without counsel and without assuring that he made a voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver of his right to counsel. We agree and reverse.

1. The constitution guarantees the right to counsel to an accused in any prosecution that could result in imprisonment.1 Although the accused may waive this right, the waiver is valid only if it is made with an understanding of (1) the nature of the charges, (2) any statutory lesser included offenses, (3) the range of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Clarke v. ZantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  3. State v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  4. Hamilton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Prater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. MARTIN-ARGAW v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  2. Reynolds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. McDaniel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  4. Humphries v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Manning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API