Legal Opinion
AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY LIMITED v. MAXELL, LTD.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 27, 2021No. 2:21-cv-08461Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 21-08461 (KM) (MF) v. OPINION MAXELL, LTD. AND MAXELL HOLDINGS, LTD., Defendants. KEVIN MCNULTY, U.S.D.J.: Maxell, Ltd. and Amperex Technology Limited (“ATL”) spent just over a year negotiating for ATL to be a licensee for some of Maxell’s patents. No agreement was reached, and shortly after a standstill agreement lapsed, ATL filed this declaratory judgment action (the “DNJ Action”). Two days later, Maxell filed a patent infringement action in the United States District Court for the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.