Legal Opinion

Dean Steel Erectors v. Virginia Steel Erectors

Rockingham County Circuit Court

Decided January 6, 1995No. Case No. (Law) 10023PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Dennis L. Hupp

It is my opinion that Rockingham County is a permissible venue for the trial of this law action. Virginia Code § 8.01-262(4) provides that the jurisdiction “[wjherein the cause of action, or any part thereof, arose” is permissible venue.

The plaintiff alleges that the parties entered into an oral contract calling for the payment of a sum of money to the plaintiff by the defendant. According to the warrant in debt filed in the General District Court of Rockingham County, the plaintiff has a Harrisonburg áddress, and it has been proffered that the plaintiff’s principal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Noland Co. v. AdenRoanoke County Circuit Court · 1980
  2. Moore Loans, Inc. v. B. E. Hardin Enterprises, Inc.Richmond County Circuit Court · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Instrumentation Services, Inc. v. Town of VictoriaVirginia Circuit Court · 2002
  2. Village Auto Center v. Apple Auto Glass & Mirror, Inc.Rockingham County Circuit Court · 2000
  3. Specialty Products, Inc. v. Demolition Services, Inc.Norfolk County Circuit Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API