Legal Opinion

Ex parte Bice

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1964No. 3 Div. 171PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

This is an original proceeding asking that we “take whatever action [is] necessary to set the record straight.”

The prayer in the application relates to the denial of relief by way of habeas corpus in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County. The petitioner states that he gave notice of appeal. The Attorney General, saying in effect that this notice was given irregularly in that it was taken by way of a letter written to the judge instead of being addressed to the circuit court, moves to strike the application.

The petitioner, while on parole from the Alabama penitentiary, left the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robert E. Greene v. Michigan Department of CorporationsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  2. United States Ex Rel. Howard v. RagenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1945
  3. In Re ColinMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. In Re CammarataMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eugene McCowan v. Louis S. Nelson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Conston v. New Mexico State Board of Probation & ParoleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Ex parte DavisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Parham v. Warden of Bridgeport Correctional CenterConnecticut Superior Court · 1975
  5. Parham v. Warden, Bridgeport Community Correctional CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API