Legal Opinion · Dissent

Parham v. Warden, Bridgeport Community Correctional Center

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 21, 1976Published

1DissentBogdanski, J.

On the facts of this case and the law applicable thereto, the trial court properly ordered the discharge of the plaintiff.

The sentence of a parolee continues to run until such time as a request for his return to custody is issued by an appropriate authority. Upon return to custody for a violation of parole, an inmate may be retained in custody for a period equal to the unexpired portion of the term of his sentence as measured from the date of the request for rearrest. *136General Statutes § 54-128. Thus, the ex parte issuance of a request for rearrest suspends the running of the parolee’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Aillon v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. Joseph Marcial, A/K/A Joseph Johnson v. Edward M. Fay, Warden of Green Haven PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API