Legal Opinion
City of Miami v. QUIK CASH JEWELARY & PAWN, INC.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 6, 2002No. 3D00-3533PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
811 So.2d 756 (2002)
CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant,
v.
QUIK CASH JEWELRY & PAWN, INC., et al., Appellees.
No. 3D00-3533.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 6, 2002.
Rehearing Denied April 12, 2002.
Alejandro Vilarello, City Attorney, and Myrna D. Bricker, Assistant City Attorney, for appellant.
Dennis R. Bedard, Miami, for appellees.
Before FLETCHER and SORONDO, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
FLETCHER, Judge.
The City of Miami has appealed a final judgment declaring fees imposed by the City on pawnshop operators to be unconstitutional taxes. We reverse.
In 1996, the legislature enacted…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Cable Television Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Emerson College v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- City of Vanceburg, Kentucky v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- State v. City of Port OrangeSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Stewart v. Verde River Irrigation & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tellas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Jasinski v. City of MiamiDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
- City of Miami v. Haigley, Etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014