Legal Opinion
City of Vanceburg, Kentucky v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 22, 1978No. 76-1755 and 76-1756PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILKEY, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner, the City of Vanceburg, Kentucky, (“Vanceburg”) here seeks review of orders issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“Commission”) granting Vanceburg licenses to construct hydroelectric powerhouses at each of two Government navigation dams on the Ohio River and assessing against Vanceburg substantial annual rental charges for the use of these two dams. Petitionér contends that the charges assessed in these orders are excessive, unreasonable, and hence unlawful. After careful analysis of the pertinent provisions of the Federal Power Act (“the Act”),…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- National Cable Television Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Federal Power Commission v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Public Service Company and Arizona Power Authority, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Emerson College v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Bloom v. City of Fort CollinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- City of Gainesville v. STATE, DOTDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.