Legal Opinion
Eastman v. City of Madison
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided December 27, 1983No. 82-2392PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GORDON MYSE,
Reserve Judge. This is an appeal from an order denying appellants’ request for declaratory relief ordering their reinstatement as City of Madison employees. Appellants’ positions of employment were vacated for failure to comply with Madison General Ordinance 3.27 1 which requires them to reside in Madison. The trial court found that vacation of appellants’ positions was proper. We agree and affirm.
Appellants contend that they complied with the ordinance, that the assurances of supervisors estopped vacation of their positions, and that the vacations are void because they were not…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kraus v. City of Waukesha Police & Fire CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Suburban Motors of Grafton, Inc. v. ForesterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
- Dog Federation of Wisconsin, Inc. v. City of South MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- City of Waukesha v. TOWN BOARD OF WAUKESHACourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Hanson v. Madison Service Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.