Dog Federation of Wisconsin, Inc. v. City of South Milwaukee
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.
This is an appeal by the Dog Federation of Wisconsin, Inc., and four persons who claim to own dogs that may be subject to regulation by a City of South Milwaukee ordinance that imposes restrictions on the ownership and keeping of "pit bulls."1 The Fed-*358©ration and the individual appellants claim that the "pit bull" aspects of the ordinance are facially invalid for the following reasons: 1) the definition of "pit bull" is impermissibly vague; 2) the ordinance is overbroad; and 3) the ordinance violates their right to equal protection of the law. We affirm.
The parties filed cross motions for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Ltd. Partnership, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Gross v. Woodman's Food Market, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- SOLESKY v. TraceyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- New York City Friends of Ferrets v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- City of Milwaukee v. BurnetteCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.