Tennent-Stribbling Shoe Co. v. Hargardine-McKittrick Dry Goods Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Attachment and Garnishee Proceedings.—Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County ¡'the Hon. John Barton Payne, Judge, presiding. Submitted at the March term, 1895.
1Opinion of the Court
Me. Presiding Justice Waterman
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Appellee, at the December term of the Superior Court, began attachment suit against W. F. Purteet, summoning the German-American Insurance Company as garnishee; the sheriff’s return upon this summons, it is said, is defective.
Granting that it is, we are of the opinion that such defect was cured by the appearance and answer of the garnishee. It is urged that a garnishee can not voluntarily come into court, and thus confer jurisdiction. The garnishee did not voluntarily come into court. Suit was begun and process issued against…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- O'Conner v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Morris v. Trustees of SchoolsIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
- Hawes v. HawesIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
- Smith v. Clinton Bridge Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1883
- Clymore v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bristol v. BrentUtah Supreme Court · 1909
- Venner v. Denver Union Water Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Equitable Life Insurance v. RyanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- National Surety Co. v. MaffioliAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909
- King v. RalstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912