Smith v. Clinton Bridge Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Appeal from the City Court of East Louis; the Hon. William P. Launtz, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
Berthold & Jennings commenced a suit by attachment against the Clinton Bridge Company on a claim for §3,027.39 and garnishee process was served on the Chicago and Alton Railroad company on the 10th day of October, 1882. At that time the garnishee was indebted to the Bridge Company in the sum of §3,770.09. Wm. 3L Smith & Co., appellants, ón the 5th day of December following, also sued out an attachment against said Bridge Company on a claim for §1,615.05 and the writ was served on the railroad company as garnishee on the day it was issued. These two attachments were both returnable to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Coughran v. GutcheusIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
- O'Conner v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by10 opinions
- Barton v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Nesbitt v. DickoverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
- Marchant v. Artists Embassy, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1960
- Silberman-Becker Corp. v. HummelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- Tennent-Stribbling Shoe Co. v. Hargardine-McKittrick Dry Goods Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.