West v. Manatawny Mut. F. & S. Ins.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Walling,
At the trial of this action of assumpsit each side submitted a point for binding instructions, that for the defendant was affirmed and a verdict rendered accordingly. Thereafter the trial court entered judgment for the plaintiff n. o. v. and defendant has appealed.
The first question raised is the jurisdiction of the court to enter such judgment. Neither at common law nor under prior legislation did such a right exist (Robinson v. Myers, 67 Pa. 9, 18; State Bank v. McCoy, 69 Pa. 204, 210), but the Act of April 22, 1905, P. L. 286, 6 Purdon, 13th ed., 7139,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Knobeloch v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Keck v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Robinson v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
- Pyle v. FinnessySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- State Bank v. McCoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
3Cited by9 opinions
- Aetna Insurance v. Kennedy Ex Rel. BogashSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Johnson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Cox v. RoehlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Watkins v. NeffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Essex Packers Limited v. KiseckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.