Interstate Sash & Door Co. v. City of Cleveland
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.
It should be noted that this appeal involves no question relating to the second cause of action which is based on negligence and is awaiting-trial. Hence, no opinion is expressed with reference thereto.
The sole phase of this controversy now before this court for consideration is whether the lower courts-were in error in sustaining the demurrer to the first cause of action which is predicated on the theory of trespass alone. ’
In its first canse of action the plaintiff alleges in substance that it is the lessee of a tract of land improved with a large warehouse located between Riverbed and West…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Taylor v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Metzger v. Pennsylvania, Ohio & Detroit Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
- City of Barberton v. MikschOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- McCord Rubber Co. v. St. Joseph Water Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1904
3Cited by17 opinions
- Moran v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Lubin v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Summit Hill Associates v. Knoxville Utilities BoardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
- Kohli v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.