Legal Opinion

Batarse v. Service Employees International Union

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 4, 2012No. F062063PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HILL, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered after the trial court granted the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant, Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 (SEIU). The trial court determined plaintiff’s opposition to the motion failed to include a separate statement of disputed and undisputed facts that conformed to the requirements of Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivision (b)(3),1 and rule *8243.1350 of the California Rules of Court;2 it exercised its discretion under section 437c, subdivision (b)(3) to grant the motion on that basis. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Morgan v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Day v. Sears Holdings Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
  2. Husman v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Diego v. Pilgrim United Church of ChristCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Rush v. White Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Acuna v. Smart & Final Stores CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2021

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API