Legal Opinion

Hill v. Blum

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 22, 1996No. 2:95-mc-00253PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

We address today the cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the parties m this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case arising from an alleged sexual assault. The pro se plaintiff is Steven Hill, a prison inmate who was housed at the State Correctional Institution in Frackville, Pennsylvama during the time period relevant to tMs lawsuit. In his complaint, Mr. Hill seeks monetary relief on the following theories: (1) that Defendant Dale Blum, a prison guard, assaulted him in violation of the rights guaranteed to him under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HornDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Booth v. KingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Allah v. Al-HafeezDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Cronin v. West Whiteland TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Wilson v. ShannonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API