Legal Opinion

Colgain v. Oy Partek Ab

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 22, 2002No. 359, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In July 2001, a Superior Court judge granted Summary Judgment to Ap-pellee, defendant-below, Oy-Partek Ab, on the products liability claims of Appellant, plaintiff-below, Ralph Colgain. The Superior Court judge found that Colgain presented insufficient evidence to establish that Partek’s predecessor in interest, Fins-ka Mineral, had the requisite actual or constructive knowledge of the hazards associated with asbestos between 1938 and 1941. In the absence of at least a 'prima facie case establishing that knowledge, Finska Mineral had no duty to warn of the potential dangers arising from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Maria NAVARRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. In Re Asbestos Litigation (Mergenthaler)Superior Court of Delaware · 1986
  4. Lynch v. Athey Products Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1985
  5. Graham v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Doe v. CahillSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  2. Anonymous Online Speakers v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. In Re Asbestos LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  4. Anonymous Online Speakers v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API