Legal Opinion
McCoy v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 27, 2001No. 96-CF-714PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WASHINGTON, Associate Judge:
After a jury trial, appellant Steven McCoy was found guilty of assault with a dangerous weapon 1 and possession of a prohibited weapon. 2 He filed a timely notice of appeal to this court arguing that: 1) there was insufficient evidence to sustain his convictions; 2) the trial court erred in not sua sponte interrupting the prosecutor during his closing and rebuttal arguments because his remarks about the credibility of the complaining witness were improper; 3) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his out-of-court identification by the complaining…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Irick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- In re S.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Payne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Williamson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Stroman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hartridge v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Euceda v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Dorsey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.