Legal Opinion
Long v. Illinois Municipal Electric Agency
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided March 30, 2000No. 3:99-cv-02108PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McCUSKEY, District Judge.
On August 13, 1998, Plaintiff, Dan Long, filed a Complaint (# 1) against Defendant, Illinois Municipal Electric Agency (IMEA). Long alleged that he was entitled to damages pursuant to 42 U-S.C. § 1983 because he had a property interest in continued employment with IMEA and he was terminated in violation of his procedural due process rights. Long also claimed that he was entitled to damages under Illinois law for breach of contract. On August 6, 1999, IMEA filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (# 15). Long also filed a Motion for Summary Judgment as to three of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Soto Gonzalez v. Rey HernandezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2004
- Miller v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- Piascik-Lambeth v. Textron AutomotiveDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000