Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Catawba County v. Burwell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1983No. 8225SC1346PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendants contend the court erred in refusing to submit the following tendered issues: (1) “Was the note completed by the plaintiff as authorized by . . . defendants?” (2) “Was the note delivered to plaintiff upon condition that . . . defendants’ liability be limited to $5,000.00?” For reasons hereafter set forth, we find no error.

The factual basis of defendants’ contention is as follows:

An officer of plaintiff bank testified that he had dealt with Horace Burwell, one of the makers, who was defendants’ son-in-law, for a number of years. Burwell had outstanding notes with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Link v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Chalmers v. WomackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Whitley v. ReddenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Clinard v. Town of KernersvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Pinner v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morrison v. StallworthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Washburn v. VandiverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API