First National Bank of Catawba County v. Burwell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
Defendants contend the court erred in refusing to submit the following tendered issues: (1) “Was the note completed by the plaintiff as authorized by . . . defendants?” (2) “Was the note delivered to plaintiff upon condition that . . . defendants’ liability be limited to $5,000.00?” For reasons hereafter set forth, we find no error.
The factual basis of defendants’ contention is as follows:
An officer of plaintiff bank testified that he had dealt with Horace Burwell, one of the makers, who was defendants’ son-in-law, for a number of years. Burwell had outstanding notes with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Link v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Chalmers v. WomackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Whitley v. ReddenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Clinard v. Town of KernersvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Pinner v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morrison v. StallworthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Washburn v. VandiverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989