Edward R. Fountain v. The United States and Redevelopment Land Agency
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
2Per curiam
This action is before us on petition and motion to dismiss. The plaintiff alleges (including his allegations in opposition to the motion) that he was the sole owner of a business concern known as the Tropieana Cafe and Lounge, situated at 113 H Street, NW., Washington, D. C., that in May 1966, defendant’s agents advised him he was in an urban renewal area and promised him $15,000 to relocate, that he did arrange to relocate ánd made various business arrangements in preparation for it, that plaintiff notified defendant he was ready, willing and able to relocate,…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Charles R. Goddard v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency, a Corporation, Charles R. Goddard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Todd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by41 opinions
- San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Housing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- James L. Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Michael R. Wood v. The United States, U.S. Customs Service, Northrop Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc., Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.