Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Co. v. Obsolete Ford Parts, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 13, 2004No. 2:03-cv-74536PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S “MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS”
CLELAND, District Judge.
Pending before the court is Plaintiff Ford Motor Company’s (“Ford’s”) “Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims,” filed on March 30, 2004. The matter has been fully briefed, and the court finds that the May 19, 2004 hearing on this matter is unnecessary. See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(e). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion will be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
According Defendant’s respOhse, Defendant Obsolete Ford Parts (“OFP”) has been a reseller of Ford reproduction parts for nearly 30 years. On September 8, 2003,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dunn Computer Corp. v. Loudcloud, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
- Microsoft Corp. v. Compusource Distributors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- Young v. Motor City Apartments Limited Dividend Housing Ass'n No 1 & No 2Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Juno Online Services, L.P. v. Juno Lighting, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Perfect Pearl Co. v. Majestic Pearl & Stone, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Santander Consumer USA Inc. v. WalshDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Max Rack, Inc. v. Core Health & Fitness, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019