Legal Opinion

Krig v. Sullivan

District Court, N.D. Florida

Decided July 6, 1992No. GCA 89-10141-MMPPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

SHERRILL, United States Magistrate Judge.

The Plaintiff has moved for an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(2). Doc. 16. The Secretary’s response, doc. 21, agrees that 14.10 hours is reasonable for the judicial portion of the claim, but argues that the amount claimed, $4,762.25, is unreasonable because it produces an hourly rate of $337.74.

Plaintiff contends that the amount claimed is reasonable because it is the contingent amount agreed upon by Plaintiff and her attorney. The contingency fee contract agreeing to a fee of 25% of past due-benefits…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Dale Wells, William Hlywa v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appeal of John S. HoggCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. Rodriquez v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Venegas v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Plas M. Allen v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Marvin KAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Ott v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
  4. Umscheid v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
  5. Kay v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API