Legal Opinion

Ott v. Apfel

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 9, 1998No. Civil Action 94-4235-DESPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAFFELS, District Judge.

This matter is before the court oh motion by plaintiffs counsel for a determination and award of attorney fees.pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) (Doc. 44).

I. BACKGROUND

On March 25, 1992, plaintiff filed an application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. Plaintiff alleged that he became unable to work because of his disabling condition on December 31, 1988. The Social Security Commissioner (“Commissioner”) denied plaintiffs, claim on May 27,1992, stating that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
Tobias J. COTTER, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
Straw v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
Plas M. Allen v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Hartter v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999
Donald Hawkins Amy Hawkins v. City of Farmingtondefendant-Appellee Farmington Police Department Robert L. Walters, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Officer of the Farmington Police Department Missouri State Highway Patrol John Doe, and All Other Unknown and Unnamed Officers and Employees of the City of Farmington Police Department and the Missouri State Highway PatrolCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999