Legal Opinion

Tel-A-Sign, Inc. v. Weesner

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaul S. Streit, J.

This is a motion by defendant Commercial International Corporation, hereinafter referred to as “ CIC”, appearing specially, to set aside service of the summons and complaint upon it. The grounds of the motion are: (1) that it has not been properly served, (2) that it was not doing business in this State at the time of service, and (3) that the person served, Weesner, at the time service was made upon him, was not a resident of this State or here on the business of CIC.

Weesner was served in this State on August 21, 1962. He admittedly was and is the president and a director of CIC. The service…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Elish v. St. Louis Southwestern RailwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Pomeroy v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Brandow v. Murray & Tregurtha Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scrivner v. Twin Americas Agricultural & Industrial Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
  2. Stepak v. Alexander's Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Scrivner v. TWIN AMERICAS AGRIC. & INDUS. DEVE.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API