Legal Opinion

Vandermark v. HOUSING AUTH. OF CITY OF YORK

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 1980No. Civ. A. 79-1064PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RAMBO, District Judge.

On June 23, 1980, this court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment with respect to plaintiffs’ claims based upon allegations that Defendant York Housing Authority’s (YHA) “indebtedness” policy violated the U. S. Housing Act and federal regulations governing Section 8 programs; that HUD’s approval of YHA’s “indebtedness” policy constituted improper rulemaking; and that YHA’s “indebtedness” policy violated plaintiffs’ right to equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. The court denied, without prejudice, defendants’ motion for summary judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Neddo v. Housing Authority of City of MilwaukeeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1971
  2. Singleton v. DrewDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vandermark v. Housing Authority of City of YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  2. James v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  3. Vandermark v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. Kohl v. Housing Auth. of City of Bloomington, Ill.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API