Legal Opinion

Meinecke v. McFarland

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1949No. 8852PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISTRICT JUDGE R. M. HATTERSLEY, sitting in place of Mr. Justice Bottomly, disqualified:

This is an action for damages brought by Lucille Meinecke, plaintiff, against John Slover McFarland, as state fish and game warden of the state of Montana, and American Bonding Company of Baltimore, defendants.

The defendants, appearing by separate counsel, filed separate general demurrers to ■ plaintiff’s amended complaint. The de murrers were sustained and time allowed plaintiff to further plead. Plaintiff, electing to stand on her amended' complaint, declined to further plead, whereupon her default was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. Bank of the MetropolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  2. Kendall v. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  3. Grider v. TallySupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  4. First Nat. Bk. of Key West v. FilerSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  5. Robinette v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dorwart v. CarawayMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Wheeler v. MoeMontana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Lythgoe v. First Security BankMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Scott v. KyhlMontana Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Strung v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API