State v. Jimeno
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
564 So.2d 1083 (1990)
STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
Luz Piedad JIMENO, et al., Respondents.
No. 75057.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 26, 1990.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for petitioner.
Sidney Efronson and Ramon Tourgeman of the Law Offices of Sidney Efronson, Miami, for respondents.
GRIMES, Justice.
We accepted jurisdiction[1] to review State v. Jimeno, 550 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), wherein the district court of appeal certified as being of great public importance a question concerning the lawfulness of searching a closed container…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- State v. JimenoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. JimenoSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- State v. HesterSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. EndoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.