Legal Opinion
State v. Jimeno
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 24, 1989No. 89-888PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
550 So.2d 1176 (1989)
The STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Luz Piedad JIMENO and Enio Jimeno, Appellees.
No. 89-888.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
October 24, 1989.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Sidney Efronson and Ramon Tourgeman and Calianne P. Lantz, Miami, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
2Per curiam
The state appeals from an order granting defendants' motion to suppress physical evidence. We affirm.
The question presented in this appeal is whether a concededly valid consent to search a motor vehicle…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Shelton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Ferguson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
4Cited by7 opinions
- State v. WaltonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- State v. JimenoSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Ferguson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- State v. HesterSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- State v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.