Legal Opinion

Heatherly v. Iowa Department of Job Service

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 17, 1986No. 85-1898PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

An equally divided court of appeals affirmed by operation of law the judicial review decision of the district court upholding the final agency decision in this job service case. The job service appeal board determined from the facts presented in this record that the claimant Carlos Heatherly was disqualified from receiving benefits by reason of his misconduct. See Iowa Code § 96.5(2)(a) (1985); 370 Iowa Admin.Code § 4.32(1). Substantial evidence in the record as a whole supports the agency decision. We affirm.

In several recent judicial review decisions we have emphasized that the district…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Higgins v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  2. Harlan v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. Hussein v. Tama Meat Packing Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  4. Hurtado v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Robbennolt v. Snap-On Tools Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. Bartelt v. Employment Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  3. Department of Transportation v. Van CannonCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990
  4. Diggs v. Employment Appeal BoardCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1991
  5. Aalbers v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API