Redfield v. Estate of Redfield
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This appeal focuses on Carson Realty’s entitlement to a broker’s commission. The district court awarded Carson Realty a broker’s fee in the amount of $320,000 on the ground that Maxit Financial Corporation, holder of a right of first refusal on the Redfield Estate property, was required to match the purchase offer of D & S Construction, Inc., which included a broker’s fee to Carson Realty. For the reasons set forth hereinafter, we disagree.
Real estate known as the Callahan Ranch property was owned by the Estate of LaVere Redfield (Estate). The Estate entered into an agreement that…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Caldwell v. Consolidated Realty & Management Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Nollner v. ThomasNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- City National Bank of Miami Beach v. LundgrenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Fleshman v. HendricksNevada Supreme Court · 1977
4Cited by5 opinions
- Reef v. BernsteinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- DePasquale v. AppMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- David Meyers, Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- Simmons v. PlummerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Summa Corp. v. DeSure Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1987