Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Consolidated Realty & Management Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1983No. 14399PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Mowbray, J.:

This appeal centers on the construction of an extension clause in a printed exclusive listing agreement furnished by respondents. In an attempt to validate the clause, which is meaningless as printed when read as a whole, we construe the word “purchaser” to mean “purchase,” thus giving the clause a meaning that is reasonable and consistent with the purposes of such clauses. As neither appellants nor respondents secured a purchase of appellants’ property within the term of the listing agreement or the subsequent 45-day period specified in the extension clause,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McCartney v. MalmWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Phillips v. MercerNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Crestview Bowl, Inc. v. Womer Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  4. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Special Service Supply Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Boutelle v. ChrislawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Crye-Leike, Inc. v. Sarah A. CarverCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
  2. Easton Business Opportunities, Inc. v. Town Executive Suites-Eastern Marketplace, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Pandelis Constraction Co. v. Jones-Viking AssociatesNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Davis v. Nevada National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Carrigan v. RyanNevada Supreme Court · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API