Caldwell v. Consolidated Realty & Management Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Mowbray, J.:
This appeal centers on the construction of an extension clause in a printed exclusive listing agreement furnished by respondents. In an attempt to validate the clause, which is meaningless as printed when read as a whole, we construe the word “purchaser” to mean “purchase,” thus giving the clause a meaning that is reasonable and consistent with the purposes of such clauses. As neither appellants nor respondents secured a purchase of appellants’ property within the term of the listing agreement or the subsequent 45-day period specified in the extension clause,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McCartney v. MalmWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Phillips v. MercerNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- Crestview Bowl, Inc. v. Womer Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Special Service Supply Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1966
- Boutelle v. ChrislawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Crye-Leike, Inc. v. Sarah A. CarverCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
- Easton Business Opportunities, Inc. v. Town Executive Suites-Eastern Marketplace, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Pandelis Constraction Co. v. Jones-Viking AssociatesNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Davis v. Nevada National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Carrigan v. RyanNevada Supreme Court · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.