Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Plummer

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 20, 1995No. 15813PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTZ, Judge.

Defendants promised to pay Plaintiff a commission if he found a buyer for their interest in a race horse. Plaintiff found a prospective buyer, who entered into a purchase agreement with Defendants. The sale was subject to the condition that a third party not exercise his right of first refusal to acquire Defendants’ interest. When the third party exercised his right, Defendants refused to pay Plaintiff a commission. Plaintiff sued and prevailed. Defendants appeal. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

The following version of events is based on unchallenged findings by the district court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. MAGNOLIA FED. S & L ASSOCIATION v. Randal Craft Realty Co., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Williams v. EnglerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Caldwell v. Consolidated Realty & Management Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Sanders v. FreelandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Stewart v. BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. SETH POLLACK VS. QUICK QUALITY RESTAURANTS, INC.(L-1000-14, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API