Simmons v. Plummer
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTZ, Judge.
Defendants promised to pay Plaintiff a commission if he found a buyer for their interest in a race horse. Plaintiff found a prospective buyer, who entered into a purchase agreement with Defendants. The sale was subject to the condition that a third party not exercise his right of first refusal to acquire Defendants’ interest. When the third party exercised his right, Defendants refused to pay Plaintiff a commission. Plaintiff sued and prevailed. Defendants appeal. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
The following version of events is based on unchallenged findings by the district court…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- MAGNOLIA FED. S & L ASSOCIATION v. Randal Craft Realty Co., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1977
- Williams v. EnglerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
- Caldwell v. Consolidated Realty & Management Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Sanders v. FreelandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Stewart v. BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- SETH POLLACK VS. QUICK QUALITY RESTAURANTS, INC.(L-1000-14, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017