Burlington Northern Railroad v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HANNA, Judge.
Defendant, Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co. (“C & NW”), appeals the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, Burlington Northern Railroad (“Burlington”). On December 1, 1984, Burlington and C & NW entered into a “Temporary Agreement Covering Advance Right of Entry and Occupancy of Burlington Northern, Inc. Property” (“Temporary Agreement”).1 This temporary agreement granted permission to C & NW to use Track No. 3 for the purpose of receiving interchange traffic from Burlington.
As consideration for C & NW’s use of the .79-mile long track, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Homan v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Dill v. Poindexter Tile CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- Baker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Berry v. CrouseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Moberly v. LeonardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tuttle v. MuenksMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- RJF International Corp. v. B.F. Goodrich Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Arvest Bank v. Cook ex rel. Russell L. Cook Revocable Trust (In re Cook)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Arvest Bank v. Empire BankUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2014