Legal Opinion

Burlington Northern Railroad v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1993No. WD 46413PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANNA, Judge.

Defendant, Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co. (“C & NW”), appeals the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, Burlington Northern Railroad (“Burlington”). On December 1, 1984, Burlington and C & NW entered into a “Temporary Agreement Covering Advance Right of Entry and Occupancy of Burlington Northern, Inc. Property” (“Temporary Agreement”).1 This temporary agreement granted permission to C & NW to use Track No. 3 for the purpose of receiving interchange traffic from Burlington.

As consideration for C & NW’s use of the .79-mile long track, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Homan v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  2. Dill v. Poindexter Tile CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Baker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Berry v. CrouseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  5. Moberly v. LeonardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. MuenksMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. RJF International Corp. v. B.F. Goodrich Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Arvest Bank v. Cook ex rel. Russell L. Cook Revocable Trust (In re Cook)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  4. Arvest Bank v. Empire BankUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API