Legal Opinion

Tuttle v. Muenks

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 2000No. WD 56969PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAURA DENVIR STITH, Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Deborah and David Tuttle appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendants-Respondents Roadway Express, Inc. and Sylvester and Mary Lou Muenks on the Tuttles’ claims for personal injuries and loss of consortium arising out of a truck accident. The trial court held that the broad language used in the indemnity provision contained in two partial releases of the Muenks which the Tuttles had signed effectively released all of their claims against the Muenks and their claims against Roadway based on vicarious liability. We concur with…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kenneth D. Allison v. Flexway Trucking, Inc. And Mark A. StuckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  2. Stanley v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  3. Graham v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. Ringstreet Northcrest, Inc. v. BisanzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Slankard v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Robert Baum v. Helget Gas Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  3. Jacobson Warehouse Co., Inc. v. Schnuck Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  4. City of St. Joseph v. Lake Contrary Sewer DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Burrus v. HBE Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API