Berry v. Crouse
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
WELBORN, Commissioner.
This is an action by appellants, husband and wife, to recover payments totaling $14,-350 which they claim to have made on a contract to purchase a farm from respondents. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found that the payments were made as rental under a lease with option to purchase and that, by the terms of the lease, the appellants were not entitled to the return of the payments which they made. The appellants appealed from the judgment of the trial court to the St. Louis Court of Appeals. Because the petition sought the return to appellants of $14,350,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- D. M. Haggard and Nila Haggard v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Ragan v. SchrefflerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Ersel H. Beus and Anna Beus, W. J. Beus, and Leone Beus v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- National Bank of Commerce v. Flanagan Mills & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Johnson ex rel. Johnson v. JF Enterprises, LLCSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Howard v. NicholsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Don King Equipment Co. v. Double D Tractor Parts, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- H. K. Porter Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Wire Rope Corporation of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- William J. Kleinheider v. Phillips Pipe Line Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.