McGill v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEWART, Judge.
A jury convicted Tracy J. McGill of first-degree sexual assault. 1 McGill argues that the superior court erroneously admitted evidence of his prior bad acts. McGill also contends that a jury instruction was faulty. We conclude that the superior court did not abuse its discretion by admitting the challenged evidence, or, at worst, committed harmless error. We further conclude that the instruction was not an abuse of disceretion. Therefore, we affirm.
Facts and proceedings
On November 7, 1997, Priscilla Dayton called the Fairbanks police and reported that a woman was being…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Love v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. StanworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Hawley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Battle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BunyardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. BabyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- People v. John Z.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Forster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010
- Mooney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.