Baughman v. Gould
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to YanBuren. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
Gould sold Baughman certain merchandise together with a small parcel of land for $1000. The lot was surrounded by a fence and there was a dwelling-house, a well and considerable ornamental shrubbery. ' It was represented by Gould that the lot included all the territory enclosed, and this representation was made by him and received by Baughman in perfect good faith. Both supposed it to be true, and Baughman in assenting to the purchase and in agreeing to terms relied upon it. The purchase of the goods and of the real estate was an entire transaction, although the price of $650 was assigned to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Starkweather v. BenjaminMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Webster v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Hunter v. New York & Saginaw Solar Salt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Steinbach v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by11 opinions
- Aldrich v. ScribnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Holcomb v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Krause v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Irwin v. CarltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Essenburg v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.