Legal Opinion

Tinsley v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 7, 1985No. 2-84-147-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FENDER, Chief Justice.

Appellant was indicted and convicted for lying about her employment status to receive Aid for Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) from the Texas Department of Human Resources. TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. sec. 32.46 (Vernon Supp.1985). Trial was to the court, and punishment was assessed at ten years probation. Appellant raises three grounds of error.

We affirm.

In her first ground of error, appellant contends that her conviction is supported by insufficient evidence, and further, that State’s exhibit nos. 6, 7, and 8 were improperly admitted as hearsay. We first note…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wicker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Bonham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Lambright v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Flournoy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Briones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  3. Jorge Fernando Briones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  4. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API