Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Hugo

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 4, 1931No. 8663PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

1. On May 4, 1925, Wimer-Richardson & Co., an investment corporation, sold certain lots in San Antonio to Jeannette Copeland Hicks, wife of W. D. Hicks. As part consideration for the land, the Hickses executed and delivered to the corporation their promissory note for the principal sum of $8,500, due five years after date, with interest at 8 per cent., payable semiannually, as evidenced by twenty interest coupon notes, ten of which were for $297.50 each, and ten for $42.50 each. The notes contained the usual attorney’s fee clause, and all of them were made payable at the office of said…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moran v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Cunningham v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Southern B. and L. Assn. v. BrackettTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Southern Building & Loan Ass'n v. BrackettTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Thomas v. First Nat. Bank of HicoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hicks v. HugoTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
  2. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Dietzel v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API