Legal Opinion

Mar-Eco, Inc. v. T & R & Sons Towing & Recovery, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 2003PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

MUSMANNO, J.:

¶ 1 Waldorf Ford, Inc., (“Waldorf’) appeals from the Order which overruled Wal-dorfs preliminary objections challenging the jurisdiction of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County and held in favor of Mar-Eco, Inc., t/d/b/a Keystone Ford (“Keystone”). We affirm.

¶ 2 The trial court set forth the facts of the case as follows:

[Waldorf] is a corporation in the business of buying and selling motor vehicles. Its principal place of business is in Waldorf, Maryland. [Keystone] is a Pennsylvania corporation which is also in the vehicle purchase and sales busi ness.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Compuserve, Incorporated v. Richard S. Patterson, Individually, and Flashpoint DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. KingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fletcher-Harlee Corp. v. SzymanskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. v. Urban Partnership, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Moyer v. Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Aventis Pasteur, Inc. v. Alden Surgical Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Haas v. Four Seasons Campground, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API