Legal Opinion
League for Protection of Oakland's Architectural & Historic Resources v. City of Oakland
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 1997No. A074348PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SWAGER, J.
Following a hearing, the trial court denied appellant’s petition for writ of mandate brought pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5 and Public Resources Code section 21168. Appellant argues that the trial court erred by finding that respondents are not required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) 1 to prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) for approval of the demolition of the Montgomery Ward Building on East 14th Street in Oakland. We reverse the judgment, based upon our conclusion that under the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Friends Of" B" Street v. City of HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Gentry v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- The Pocket Protectors v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- County Sanitation District No. 2 v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Citizens for a Megaplex-Free Alameda v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- McAllister v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Architectural Heritage Ass'n v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.