Legal Opinion

People v. Burton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1989No. 82216, (Calendar No. 6)PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.

This unusual case presents the question whether extrajudicial statements sought to be admitted into evidence as excited utterances under MRE 803(2), standing alone, may establish the foundation for their own admissibility. Specifically, we are asked to decide whether such statements may be admitted when there is no independent evidence, direct or circumstantial, of the underlying startling event to which the statements relate. We answer this question in the negative and reverse the defendant’s convictions.

I. FACTS

Defendant Norman Leroy Burton was convicted by a jury of two counts of…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Richardson v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. PetrellaMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. LeonardIllinois Supreme Court · 1980

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StallworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. People v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. JordanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. United States v. Tishon Brown, AKA Clarence Brown, Jr. Tishon Brown, United States of America v. Clarence Brown, AKA Tishon Brown Tishon BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. Berryman v. K Mart Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API