Legal Opinion
Twohig v. Briner
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 5, 1985No. 31012Published
1Opinion of the Court
168 Cal.App.3d 1102 (1985)
214 Cal. Rptr. 729
CANDACE TWOHIG, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
JANET BRINER, Defendant and Respondent.
Docket No. 31012.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.
June 5, 1985.
COUNSEL
James J. Warner for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Morris, Polich & Purdy and Charles R. Bongard for Defendant and Respondent.
OPINION
WORK, Acting P.J.
Candace Twohig appeals a summary judgment in favor of Janet Briner on her complaint for personal injuries incurred while a passenger in a car from which the seat belts had been removed. (1a) The sole issue is whether the trial court…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Corwin v. Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Spier v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.