Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Harris

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1921No. File No. 4842PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Roberts County Hon. Frank Anderson, Judge.; Action by Iver Hanson, against H. G. Harris, to recover damages for alleged malpractice. • From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals. (2) To point two of the opinion, Appellant cited: Dean v. Seeman, 176 X. W. 649; Staloch v. Holms 100 Minn. 276, m X. W. 264.

1Opinion of the CourtPOIjDEY, P. J.

Action for the recovery of damages for alleged malpractice. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendant appeals.

Some time during the month of February, 1914, plaintiff was injured by having a wagon wheel run over his right knee. A physician was called, but the knee soon became badly swollen and inflamed and became very painful. About two weeks after the injury defendant was consulted and asked to treat plaintiff for the injur "it was a practicing physician and surgeon, *460and owned and conducted a hospital at the town of Wilmot. He caused plaintiff to be removed to his hospital and at once examined…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dean v. SeemanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wright v. ConwayWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Block v. McVaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Hansen v. IsaakSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Warwick v. BlissSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  5. McCoy v. CleggWyoming Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API