Legal Opinion
Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 9, 1982No. Nos. 80-2099, 80-2327PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERRE S. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners in these consolidated cases are the nation’s railroads and the National Motor Freight Traffic Association (NMFTA), an organization composed of approximately 3,000 common motor carriers. We shall refer to petitioners collectively as “Carriers.” The Carriers have sought review, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2321(a), 2342(5), and 2344, of a portion of an order by the Interstate Commerce Commission (the Commission), Ex Parte No. 370, Tariff Improvement (June 10, 1981). As explained below, Ex Parte No. 370 introduced a new procedure for ensuring compliance…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Postal Workers Union, Afl-Cio, Wilma M. Carter v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Company & Other Railroads v. The United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. v. The United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982