Legal Opinion
Boling v. National Zinc Co.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 30, 1976No. 75-C-365-CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER SUSTAINING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COOK, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment on Behalf of National Zinc Company, John S. Van Aken, Jack L. Truman, Melvin E. McCluskey and Thomas L. Vogt and The Motion of Defendants, State Insurance Fund and Chris Sturm, to Dismiss, or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment.
The Complaint alleges that the named plaintiffs and all other members of the class which they represent and which is designated as the past, present and future employees of the defendant, National Zinc Company, (hereinafter “Zinc”) have…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brown v. ReardonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Boddorff v. Publicker Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Kodish v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1979
- Holman v. HiltonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
- Stevens v. Sanpete CountyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.