Legal Opinion
State v. Madril
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 1987No. 9501PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRUMAN, Judge.
Following the burglary of a neighbor’s residence, defendant was charged with intentionally receiving stolen property over one hundred dollars, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-16-11 (Repl.Pamp.1984). At some time during the pendency of this charge, the property that had been in defendant’s possession was returned to the victim. Other property taken in the burglary and valued at approximately $4,892 was not recovered. Defendant was not charged with burglary and did not admit to any of the elements of burglary or conspiracy to commit burglary. Defendant entered a plea of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. DillonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- United States v. Steven Wayne TylerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- State v. TaylorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Cumhuriyet v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- State v. LackNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Renfro v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Buffington v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BlanchardMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. PalmerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Erickson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.