Legal Opinion

State of Wash. v. M/V DILKARA

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided April 11, 1979No. C77-22TPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER STRIKING AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE AND COUNTERCLAIM

BEEKS, Senior District Judge.

This action involves an allision between the M/V DILKARA and the Blair Bridge owned and operated by the State of Washington. At the time of the allision, J. P. Osnes, a compulsory pilot, licensed by the State, was on board DILKARA to assist in navigation. In answer to the complaint, defendant pleads as an affirmative defense and counterclaim the issue of vicarious liability. DILKARA contends that, because of State’s extensive regulation and control over the pilot, any negligence of the pilot would be imputed to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Development Co. v. City of Long BeachDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1960
  2. Port of Seattle v. M/V MARIA RUBICONDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Societa Per Azioni De Navigazione Italia v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. British-American Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1990
  3. Food Lion, Inc. v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
  4. Kitanihon-Oi Steamship Company v. General Construction Company, and Sacramento-Yolo Port DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Puerto Rico Ports Authority v. M/V "Manhattan Prince"District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API