Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 2, 2010No. 09-P-1023PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWolohojian, J.

Today we address whether purchasing a nonconforming lot with actual knowledge of its nonconformity is, standing alone, sufficient basis upon which to deny zoning relief as a self-created hardship. We hold that it is not.

*514Background. The facts, as set out in the Superior Court judge’s written findings, are not contested on appeal, but we repeat those, and others, that are relevant here. Paul G. Lamb and David M. Lamb, suing individually and as cotrustees of D&P Realty Trust (D&P Realty) (collectively, plaintiffs), own two adjacent lots (lots) in the city of Taunton (city). Paul3 previously had…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pheasant Ridge Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Town of BurlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Tsagronis v. Board of Appeals of WarehamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Damaskos v. Board of Appeal of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Chirichello v. ZONING BOARD, BOROUGH OF MONMOUTH BEACHSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  5. Johnny Cake, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pawn 1st LLC v. City of Phoenix/jachimekArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Brundige v. ToddMassachusetts Superior Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API