Pawn 1st LLC v. City of Phoenix/jachimek
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE LOPEZ,
opinion of the Court:
¶ 1 This case concerns the standards a municipal zoning board applies in considering an application for a zoning variance. We hold that to obtain an area variance, an applicant must show that strictly applying a zoning ordinance will cause “peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties” that deprive a property of privileges enjoyed by other similarly zoned properties. We also clarify that the applicant’s desire to use the property for purposes allowed on other similarly zoned properties does not in itself constitute a self-imposed special circumstance…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Robert Baker v. University Physicians HealthcareArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- Minney v. City of AzusaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Mueller v. City of Phoenix Ex Rel. Phoenix Board of Adjustment IIArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Ivancovich v. City of Tucson Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Arkules v. BD. OF ADJUST. OF PARADISE VALLEYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maria Rosas v. ades/chicanos Por La Causa IncArizona Supreme Court · 2020
- Maria Rosas v. ades/chicanos Por La Causa IncArizona Supreme Court · 2020
- Son Silver v. SedonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- State of Arizona v. Az Board of RegentsArizona Supreme Court · 2022
- Takieh v. Banner HealthDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021